Category: Other

Discussion In October 2021, the Army announced, “SHARP Fusion Directorates.” This coming spring, sexual assault survivors at six Army installations will be able to access all of their victim services under one installation directorate as part of a new pilot program. The program will become a comprehensive overhaul of the Army’s Sexual Harassment/Assault Response and Prevention program. It is intended to increase accountability, transparency, and efficiency by coordinating all victim response elements, including victim advocates, medical care providers, law enforcement investigators, and criminal prosecutors under a single directorate. By synchronizing — and in some cases, co-locating these support services, either physically or virtually — it will be easier for victims to get the help they need.” Discuss how the pilot can potentially help sexual assault survivors. Will Soldiers be more likely to report cases of sexual assault? Or receive better care?

Discussion Mission command is the exercise of authority and direction by the commander using mission orders to enable disciplined initiative within the commander’s intent to empower agile and adaptive leaders in the conduct of unified land operations (ADP 6-0). Mission command is both a philosophy and a warfighting function. Mission command is also a warfighting function. The mission command warfighting function is the related tasks and systems that develop and integrate those activities enabling a commander to balance the art of command and the science of control in order to integrate the other warfighting functions. As a warfighting function, mission command consists of the related tasks and a mission command system that support the exercise of authority and direction by the commander.

A Health Risk Assessment (HRA) form allows a private insurer in Saudi Arabia to assess an individual’s health and lifestyle. You have been tasked with drafting a memo to the CEO addressing how an HRA could help your insurance company. Be sure to address the following components: Frequency and purpose of an HRA; Examples of questions asked on an HRA; The impact of an HRA on risk and premium cost; Negative implications of HRAs on those with chronic illness and Best practices involving HRAs. Your memo should meet the following structural requirements: The memo should be 4-5 pages in length, not including the cover sheet and reference page. Formatted according to APA and Saudi Electronic University writing standards. Provide support for your statements with in-text citations from a minimum of four scholarly articles. Two of these sources may be from the class readings, textbook, or lectures, but two must be external. The Saudi Digital Library is a good place to find these references.

Considering the 5 steps in Health Impact Assessment (screening, scoping, appraisal, reporting, and monitoring). What might be included at each step in a proposal for a community wellness park? Follow APA guidelines for writing style, spelling and grammar, and citation of sources.

This week let us continue our exploration into the intricate intersection of faith and research ethics. This week, our focus turns to the practical aspects of conducting research ethically, with a specific emphasis on the pivotal role of ethics committees and institutional review boards (IRB). As we navigate this terrain, let’s immerse ourselves in the profound guidance provided by Colossians 3:17 – “And whatsoever ye do in word or deed, do all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God and the Father by him.” This biblical principle serves as a compass, directing us to align every action and utterance with the name of the Lord. It compels us not only to meet the standards set by human institutions but to elevate our work as an offering unto the Lord. In the context of pharmacy research, where the confluence of scientific inquiry and ethical considerations is paramount, how does our faith guide our interactions with ethics committees and review boards? Consider the process of seeking approval for your research from an ethics committee. How does your faith influence the way you articulate your research objectives, potential impacts, and ethical considerations? Our engagement with these institutional bodies becomes an opportunity not only to meet ethical standards but to infuse the process with a sacred commitment to Christ-like integrity. How can we view the dialogue with ethics committees and review boards as an act of worship, recognizing that our work is not merely for academic or professional acclaim but ultimately for the glory of God? When seeking approval from ethics committees or IRBs, ponder how your faith influences the approach, and how these institutional structures can be a vessel for your Christian principles.

Population health models provide a broad perspective on health. The term health is more than the absence of disease. These broader health models view health as it occurs within social and environmental context including education, racial, ethnic, genetic, physical environment, income level, and individual behavioral choices. For this discussion, consider the health of your own community within this context. Describe factors in your community that contribute to health and aspects that are barriers to a community’s ability to achieve full health status. answer the discussion prompt with a minimum of 500 words using APA format and style. A reference list is required for your initial posting.

Review the included resources and respond to the following questions:
Why has trust in government declined in the United States?
What are some dangers of low levels of public trust in government?
What do you think could be done differently, either by the public or by government officials, to improve public trust of our governing institutions?
Pew Survey-
​https://www.youtube.com/watch?v＝ME9biwO-u2w (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
The Constitution in Crisis-
​https://www.youtube.com/watch?v＝nDgx5jefO5E (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
Big Data and Transparency-
​https://www.youtube.com/watch?v＝b0eotL_M6W8 (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
Americans Aren′t Cooperating- https://www.americanpress.com/opinion/jim-beam/americans-arent-cooperating/article_4a871118-e565-11ea-af20-f37a81d02df2.html (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
Pew Report on Trust and Distrust in America- https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2019/07/22/trust-and-distrust-in-america/Links to an external site.
Per the syllabus:
WRITING ASSIGNMENTS: There are three writing assignments, aside from the final essay mentioned below. Each of these three assignments is worth 50 points. Assignments are expected to be 2-3 pages each, double-spaced, 12-point font, with 1” margins. Each writing assignment should include at least two properly-cited academic sources. Citation styles should be Chicago/APSA, though I will not deduct points for other styles used.

Is Tennessee Williams′ 1947 play A Streetcar Named Desire a Tragedy, that is, although written some 2500 years after Oedipus the King, does it use the same tragic structure identified by Aristotle in the Poetics? Answer five questions below to find out.
Please note: This assignment asks you to analyze the play in terms of the ideas that the course has been discussing, and to do your own thinking. It does not call for or require the use of outside sources, and I advise against it. Should you choose to consult outside sources, be sure to cite them accordingly by putting phrases or sentences that you have taken from outside sources in quotation marks, and acknowledging each individual idea that is not yours when it appears in your text. (It is not enough to simply provide the name of a Website to cover your entire essay.) Failure to properly cite outside sources will result in a failing grade for this assignment.
Let me reiterate: Every semester I′m forced to fail students on this assignment for using ideas and phrases taken from uncited sources. Please do not do it. The easiest way to avoid plagiarizing is to not consult outside sources and do your own thinking.
Before you answer the questions below, first copy and paste the questions into a blank document, and then write your answers underneath each question in essay form, i.e., with complete sentences, proper grammar and spelling and linear thought. (None are simple “yes” or “no” questions; you are expected to support your answers, and direct references to events in the play and passages in the text that support your answers are encouraged.)
When you have finished, to submit the assignment look for the button that reads ″submit assignment″. Once you click on that, it will open the text entry box. Copy and paste your finished assignment, proofread it, and then click on the ″submit assignment″ button on that page to actually submit the work.
Each question is worth 10 points. You can access the grading rubric for this assignment here.
Questions
1. Does the play have a protagonist? (Remember, Aristotle states a Tragedy can only have ONE protagonist, and that protagonist by definition has a need, a praxis, that creates the cause-and-effect structure of the play.) If so, who is it? What makes you think so? Why that character, and not another? 2. Is there a praxis, that is, a need by the Protagonist which drives the main action and results in an organic, cause-and-effect structure? If so, name the praxis. Or is the play episodic, lacking a praxis and thus Unity of Action? Either way, explain your thinking; this means detailing the plot structure, showing how each major event DURING the play does — or doesn′t — lead to the next. (This excludes backstory, the events that happened before the play begins, such as the death of Blanche′s husband, etc.) Let me remind you that Aristotle says a Tragedy must have a cause-and-effect structure; if you believe Streetcar is episodic, then there is no protagonist. Also, the time-frame of the play is unimportant; a play can take play over a day, a week, months or years and still be organic, as long as the chain of cause-and-effect is present.
3. Does the play have a reversal, that is, a moment when it looks like the protagonist will fulfill his or her praxis, and then suffers a serious setback?
4. Is there a recognition, a moment that marks the end of the praxis and gives the protagonist a new understanding of the world and/or their relation to it? If there is, what is it, where is it, who has it, and what makes you say so? If there is not a recognition, explain why not.
5. If there is a recognition, does it result in a change of status for the protagonist? What makes you say so? Or not?
Important Info
The order was placed through a short procedure (customer skipped some order details).
Please clarify some paper details before starting to work on the order.
Type of paper and subject
Number of sources and formatting style
Type of service (writing, rewriting, etc)

From Lincoln and Douglass compose a persuasive speech powerful enough to move the audience to action
Important Info
The order was placed through a short procedure (customer skipped some order details).
Please clarify some paper details before starting to work on the order.
Type of paper and subject
Number of sources and formatting style
Type of service (writing, rewriting, etc)

What does Warren say is the traditional argument against abortion? How does she criticize this argument? In particular, why does she think that the argument engages in equivocation involving the meaning of the term “human”? What criteria does Warren use for establishing personhood (and thus membership in the moral community), and what role does this play in her defense of abortion? What is Noonan’s view of abortion and how might Warren critique it? How might Marquis respond to Warren, and on what basis? Evaluate Warren’s criteria for personhood, using philosophical reasoning.How does Corvino respond to the argument that homosexuality is morally wrong because it is unnatural? In responding, consider various understandings of “unnatural” that Corvino discusses. Evaluate his critique of the supposed “unnaturalness” of homosexuality, using philosophical reasoning.