Please respond to the following questions related to chapters 7 and 8 in Crime &

Please respond to the following questions related to chapters 7 and 8 in Crime & Social Justice in Indian Country.
Chapter 7
1. What is the disadvantage of state recognition of tribes? How does state recognition differ from federal recognition?
2. How did the Marshall trilogy influence the view of the state-tribe relationship?
3. How did the gaming/casino industry open a path for states and tribes to interact differently?
4. What was the motivation for ICWA and why is the proper identification of Indigenous children important?
5. What was the novel argument about the relationship between tribes, states, and the federal government that proposes collaboration between North Carolina and tribes with state recognition did not contradict ICWA?
Chapter 8
You may wish to consult background resources about Aotearoa/New Zealand for a fuller appreciation of this chapter and to help with the questions.
1. What was the colonial British (and after independence American settler) view of indigenous groups (polities) and how did treaty making expose this view as a lie or fiction?
2. What influence did the Canons of Construction have on the legal status of Maori in Aotearoa/New Zealand?
3. How do the Community Justice Boards differ from the adversarial system?
4. How does the Family Group Conference resemble an adversarial system?
5. In the chapter’s discussion about the juvenile justice system in New Zealand, the authors mention concerns Maori have raised. After watching the short documentary (produced by the NZ Ministry of Justice) Links to an external site. what concerns does the Rangatahi courts appear to address?

Assignment Details Prior to your graduation from AIU, you have been working as

Assignment Details
Prior to your graduation from AIU, you have been working as the Victims’ Assistant Advocate for the office of the local county prosecutor. You have a great working relationship with the prosecutor, Mary, and the remainder of the office. Normally, when you speak, the staff and the prosecutor know that you are speaking from a knowledge base that you have gained from personal experience, research, and reading, so they know that your comments are facts. You use APA format to cite your sources for this project.
You have decided to speak with the prosecutor, Mary, on behalf of Maureen, a college student who was a sexual assault victim (date rape). You want to convince Mary to support a change in the prosecutor’s policy of not prosecuting sexual assault (date rape) cases when drugs or alcohol is involved. Mary has a strict policy: When someone wants to speak with her about changing an established policy, she wants the person to submit a PowerPoint presentation that outlines his or her argument for the policy change prior to meeting her. This way she feels that she is not blind-sided, and that she has an opportunity to research the topic prior to the meeting.
You follow her policy and prepare a 10 to 15-slide PowerPoint presentation, hoping that you can persuade Mary and the chief prosecutor to change their policy or, at a minimum, meet with you for a discussion about changing the policy. Maureen knows that other young women are being attacked and that often drugs are used.
Mary has agreed to review your PowerPoint presentation, which includes video links.
Educate Mary about sexual assault (date rape) cases, statistics and date rape drugs.
Explain why not prosecuting the cases is the wrong public and social policy. Provide crime statistics reported by Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) and the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) relating to rape and the strengths and weaknesses of each type of reporting.
Define the term date rape (or acquaintance rape; the terms are interchangeable) and how date rape is distinguished from stranger rape, statutory rape, and spousal rape.
List the types and uses of date rape drugs.
Describe the victim–offender relationship, including the following:
How victims are viewed by perpetrators of date rape.
The special problems of date rape prosecutions.
How society and jurors may view date rape (e.g., blaming the victim based on the perceived precipitation, facilitation, or provocation of the victim).
Use a case example (see resource for this assignment).

Directions: Using the following link (https://www.biography.com/people/groups/se

Directions: Using the following link (https://www.biography.com/people/groups/serial-killers), select one serial killer case to answer the below questions. Answer/Discuss the Following: Describe the case you selected to include the personal history of the serial killer, the facts of the case and how the killer was eventually identified (less than two pages). Discuss in detail the killer’s crime scenes and any crime scene patterns identified during the investigation. Describe why the patterns where significant to the investigation. Did investigators identify these patterns and use them to further their investigation? Identifying two significant items of evidence recovered during the investigation and discuss why each item was so significant and how it could have, or did, lead to the identity of the killer. Discuss the investigation and identify two deficiencies in the investigations, leading to the individual continuing their crimes. Discuss how these deficiencies could have been avoided or overcome. Discuss two modern forensic, technological or database advances if in existence at the time of the killings could have been used to catch the killer earlier on in the investigation. Format Requirements Paper must be double spaced, 11 or 12 pt font and 1”margins all around. All APA 7th edition format requirements must be followed (cover page, in text citations, reference page). Refer to APA/UMGC – learning resources found in the content page of this course. You must have resources to support your thoughts/opinions/information.  These must be cited both in text as well as at the end of the document. Your paper should not contain direct quotes, sourced material must be paraphrased.

Racism and Egoism in Criminal Justice

Page
2
of 2
Midterm Policy Paper
Course-level outcomes:
 Develop critical thinking skills to analyze ethical issues
 Discuss theories of moral development
 Analyze ethical dilemmas
 Discuss ethics and the criminal justice professional
Student Learning Outcomes for midterm
At the conclusion of this module, students will be able to:
 Identify unethical themes in criminal justice
 Discuss theories of racism and the moral guidelines that condemn it
 Identify the problem of corporal punishment and brutality in criminal justice
 Discuss the limits of authority and power
 Recommend innovative or new evidence-based policies in criminal justice
Directions:
For this midterm policy paper please select one of the major issues discussed and listed below to
form a change in current policy, an improvement of current policy, or the elimination of current
law or policy. For the assignment, you will want to address the ethical considerations in your
policy position and then use outside research or articles to support your position. Ideally you will
include at least 5 peer-reviewed research articles from the Lasell Library’s database. You can
also find academic journal articles through Google Scholar.
Length and Format: The paper should be 4-5 pages double spaced in Times New Roman 12
Point Font with 1in Margins (APA Format). The cover page would not count towards page
length if you choose to include one.
Grading: The project is graded on the overall quality of the writing, the following of the
directions, and the proper APA format of in-text citations and referencing of sources.
Policy Research Topics/Questions related to Racism and Egoism in Criminal Justice:
 Should we continue the Death Penalty in the US?
 In terms of the egoism of deadly force (See Ch. 8), what can be done to prevent the
occurrence of unarmed shootings of African American males?
 What can be done to prevent racial discrimination within the criminal justice system?
Choose a specific policy/law/practice.
 What policies or practices could be employed in criminal justice agencies that would
reduce or eliminate the abuse of authority? For example, would body cameras be a good
investment? Should they be mandatory? How would the video be used?
Paper Outline:
I. Introduction (This is where you tell me about your topic and why it is important as well
as state your hypotheses/position)
II. Part 1: the ethical theory or principle related to your topic (Use the textbook to explain
your ethical reasoning behind the issues you are focusing on)
III. Part 2: your specific recommendation (Summarize your specific issue and tie in your
outside research to provide readers with evidence to support you)
IV. Conclusion (Review what you wrote and remind the reader about why we should adopt
your stance)
V. References (APA style reference page)
Looking forward to reading your paper!
choose any of the four option given in the text thank you

What is the impact of this dilemma on the criminal justice system or general population? What are the consequences/harm of the dilemma (short and long term)? Tell me about a tuna fish sandwich.

Critical Thinking Essay : Papers should be double spaced, and all should have APA citations (Seehttps://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/a… Citations and Reference List). You should have at least 5 sources for this paper (not including the book assigned for this course). Sources should be academic sources (peer reviewed journal articles, books, etc.). This paper should be at least 1250 wordcount. Papers will be graded according to the content but also grammar, punctuation, spelling, and flow/organization. Choose an ethical dilemma within the Criminology/Criminal Justice Field. Define the dilemma. What makes it a dilemma? Describe the extent of the dilemma (how frequently it occurs, how common is the dilemma, etc.). Tell me a joke about a chicken.
What is the impact of this dilemma on the criminal justice system or general population? What are the consequences/harm of the dilemma (short and long term)? Tell me about a tuna fish sandwich.
What is your stance on the dilemma? Tie in an ethical theory to support your stance (here is where you will need cite from the assigned book). What are some policy or other implications to reduce or remove the dilemma?
Book name:Schur, M. (2022) How to Be Perfec t: The correct answer to every moral question. NY: Simon & Schuster

what do we know about adult perpetrators of domestic violence?

Based on Chapter 10 in our text and article “Intimate Partner Violence and Pet Abuse: Responding Law Enforcement Officers’ Observations and Victim Reports at the Scene,” what do we know about adult perpetrators of domestic violence? What are the main characteristics among adults perpetrators of intimate partner violence? What are some of the key findings in the study, and what does that tell us about the best ways to intervene in these situations?…. Link to the article:
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0886260518759653