NO AI AND NO PLAGERISM I added the sources and the hypothesis in the attached do

NO AI AND NO PLAGERISM
I added the sources and the hypothesis in the attached document.
Format
12 point font in Times New Roman, Georgia, Calibri, or Arial
1″ margins
Double-spaced
At least 1500 words, not counting the cover page, figures, or references
Consist of title page, introduction, main analysis, conclusions, and reference sections
General Formal Writing Guidelines
Scientific writing should be written in a formal, unbiased manner.
Do not use contractions.
Write our numbers less than 10, unless they are measurements.
Write scientific names out fully once in the body of the paper. You may then shorten for the rest of the paper.
Homo sapiens
H. sapiens
Title Page
While review papers do not typically have very long titles, they do need informative titles.
The title should help the reader to understand the main conclusion of your paper.
Make the title concise but be sure to include 3-4 key words.
Include your name, your instructor’s name, and the due date
Introduction
Be sure to set up the importance of the study question.
Give the reader the necessary background to prepare them for the study question. Do not include very general information, be specific to the purpose of your review.
End the introduction with the study research question, study approach, and thesis statement. For example:
In this review, the efficacy of capsaicin in the treatment of cancer cells is investigated through in vivo studies evaluating tumor growth, metastasis rates, and patient mortality. This evaluation demonstrated that while capsaicin has effects on these parameters, the doses required limit it’s utility as a clinical therapy.
Analysis
This section should be around 50-60% of your paper (At least two pages)
I am looking for at least three primary papers that you will analyze in this short paper. Longer review papers will compare more studies.
Every study you present should have data you use to address the study question.
THE MOST IMPORTANT PART – You need your analysis in this section. Compare and contrast the studies. What are their strengths and weaknesses? Do the conclusions of these studies agree or disagree with each other?
Be sure to create a clear narrative in the analysis section
I present an example below, with just blank variable names, but I hope you can get the idea.
Smith and Jones (2015) did not consider the effects of *variable 1* or *variable 2* on cell apoptosis. A follow up study by Smith and colleagues (2016) addressed one weakness in the first study by altering their experimental design to include mRNA and protein expression of *gene name* which accounted for *variable 1*.
You could then go on to talk about what the second study found and how considering *variable 1* altered the interpretation of the first studies results.
This approach not only allows transition between the studies, it also allows you to include the strengths and weakness of the studies and to compare and contrast the studies.
You don’t have to use the above approach, but I hope it give you some ideas on how you could set up your analysis.
You may also include a novel figure/graph/table that you create from the data in the primary literature to get the very best score possible on this section.
Perhaps all three of your studies looked at % cell death under different circumstances (such as pH and temperature). You could create a graph with the data from the different studies all on one graph where you put the variable (pH and temperature) on the x-axis and then % cell death on the y-axis. Then you could then address whether pH or temperature had a greater impact on cell death using the graph to answer your question.
Figures ( other than Graphical Abstract)
Original Figures are an optional element as part of the Body of the Paper
If Included Figures should be original (created by you) and NOT just copied and pasted from your source papers.
Original figures should summarize and synthesize data from multiple papers.
The figure should include proper references of where the data came from, and a good figure legend.
The figure needs to be discussed in the text of your paper- Don’t just dump it in, and DON’T just include one throw away line about see Figure 1. What conclusion do you want the reader to come to from the figure? It may be a summary of data, a summary of experimental variables tested or conditions, species used, etc. So think about if you can use a figure to really hammer home your point!
Conclusions
Summarize what you have found and frame it in the context of answering the research question and thesis statement. Put your own spin on the “answer” to your question. Make judgement calls, if you are comparing how two drugs treat a certain disease, then which one do you think is the better one? Support your conclusion with the papers you reviewed.
What kinds of questions are still out there to be answered? What kinds of weaknesses are present in the body of literature addressing the question? Do you have suggestions for future studies?
References
You must have both in-text citations and a reference section.
Use Numeric in text References and follow ASM formatting.

Part A) Compare and contrast the Three Mile Island, Pennsylvania nuclear core pa

Part A) Compare and contrast the Three Mile Island, Pennsylvania nuclear core partial meltdown accident in 1979, the Chernobyl, Ukraine nuclear meltdown accident in 1986 and the recent nuclear accident in Japan on March 11, 2011. What are the similarities and differences in the way each accident was handled? Use credible sources, e.g. edu, news articles, publications. You may use the learning center if needed. Please write your answer below in your own words and minimum 250 words . Please cite sources (50%):
Part B) The Shearon Harris Nuclear Station is located in New Hill, North Carolina, about 20 miles southwest of Raleigh and Durham, NC. What do the people in the zoning area need to prepare for in the event of an accident? Should you be concerned that the nuclear power plant is near NCCU? Use credible sources to research Shearon Harris nuclear plant operations, plans, safety measures, etc. Own words and minimum 250 words (50 %): Please cite sources.

Your main goal with this article summary assignment is to pull out the main poin

Your main goal with this article summary assignment is to pull out the main points!
Summaries should be 1 page typed, 12-point font, double-spaced, and should cover the main points of the articles as well as anything you found interesting or troublesome. These summaries MUST be in YOUR OWN words so you will need to paraphrase the information presented. Both parenthetical in-text citations and formal references in CSE format are REQUIRED! Failure to include both will result in a zero on the assignment.
A PDF version of the article can be found on Carmen > Modules. The Article Summary Rubric can be found on Carmen > Modules. We will use the same generalized rubric for all 3 article summary assignments!
These article summaries are submitted and processed through TurnItIn. If you submit your summary in advance of the deadline, you can check your TurnItIn plagiarism score. For any scores over 10% (yellow or red indicators), take a look at the TurnItIn feedback report to see what has been flagged. If large sections of text are flagged (excluding references and title), feel free to work on your paraphrasing, and re-submit your summary before the deadline, if you would like!

NO AI AND NO PLAGERISM I added the sources and the hypothesis in the attached do

NO AI AND NO PLAGERISM
I added the sources and the hypothesis in the attached document.
Format
12 point font in Times New Roman, Georgia, Calibri, or Arial
1″ margins
Double-spaced
At least 1500 words, not counting the cover page, figures, or references
Consist of title page, introduction, main analysis, conclusions, and reference sections
General Formal Writing Guidelines
Scientific writing should be written in a formal, unbiased manner.
Do not use contractions.
Write our numbers less than 10, unless they are measurements.
Write scientific names out fully once in the body of the paper. You may then shorten for the rest of the paper.
Homo sapiens
H. sapiens
Title Page
While review papers do not typically have very long titles, they do need informative titles.
The title should help the reader to understand the main conclusion of your paper.
Make the title concise but be sure to include 3-4 key words.
Include your name, your instructor’s name, and the due date
Introduction
Be sure to set up the importance of the study question.
Give the reader the necessary background to prepare them for the study question. Do not include very general information, be specific to the purpose of your review.
End the introduction with the study research question, study approach, and thesis statement. For example:
In this review, the efficacy of capsaicin in the treatment of cancer cells is investigated through in vivo studies evaluating tumor growth, metastasis rates, and patient mortality. This evaluation demonstrated that while capsaicin has effects on these parameters, the doses required limit it’s utility as a clinical therapy.
Analysis
This section should be around 50-60% of your paper (At least two pages)
I am looking for at least three primary papers that you will analyze in this short paper. Longer review papers will compare more studies.
Every study you present should have data you use to address the study question.
THE MOST IMPORTANT PART – You need your analysis in this section. Compare and contrast the studies. What are their strengths and weaknesses? Do the conclusions of these studies agree or disagree with each other?
Be sure to create a clear narrative in the analysis section
I present an example below, with just blank variable names, but I hope you can get the idea.
Smith and Jones (2015) did not consider the effects of *variable 1* or *variable 2* on cell apoptosis. A follow up study by Smith and colleagues (2016) addressed one weakness in the first study by altering their experimental design to include mRNA and protein expression of *gene name* which accounted for *variable 1*.
You could then go on to talk about what the second study found and how considering *variable 1* altered the interpretation of the first studies results.
This approach not only allows transition between the studies, it also allows you to include the strengths and weakness of the studies and to compare and contrast the studies.
You don’t have to use the above approach, but I hope it give you some ideas on how you could set up your analysis.
You may also include a novel figure/graph/table that you create from the data in the primary literature to get the very best score possible on this section.
Perhaps all three of your studies looked at % cell death under different circumstances (such as pH and temperature). You could create a graph with the data from the different studies all on one graph where you put the variable (pH and temperature) on the x-axis and then % cell death on the y-axis. Then you could then address whether pH or temperature had a greater impact on cell death using the graph to answer your question.
Figures ( other than Graphical Abstract)
Original Figures are an optional element as part of the Body of the Paper
If Included Figures should be original (created by you) and NOT just copied and pasted from your source papers.
Original figures should summarize and synthesize data from multiple papers. The figure should include proper references of where the data came from, and a good figure legend.
The figure needs to be discussed in the text of your paper- Don’t just dump it in, and DON’T just include one throw away line about see Figure 1. What conclusion do you want the reader to come to from the figure? It may be a summary of data, a summary of experimental variables tested or conditions, species used, etc. So think about if you can use a figure to really hammer home your point!
Conclusions
Summarize what you have found and frame it in the context of answering the research question and thesis statement. Put your own spin on the “answer” to your question. Make judgement calls, if you are comparing how two drugs treat a certain disease, then which one do you think is the better one? Support your conclusion with the papers you reviewed.
What kinds of questions are still out there to be answered? What kinds of weaknesses are present in the body of literature addressing the question? Do you have suggestions for future studies?
References
You must have both in-text citations and a reference section.
Use Numeric in text References and follow ASM formatting.

Module 6 Introduction: In the module 5 discussion, you identified a method of pr

Module 6
Introduction: In the module 5 discussion, you identified a method of prevention for each prevention tier (primary, secondary, and tertiary). This week, you were provided information regarding how public health assesses each the effectiveness of a prevention method. This assessment can be economic or in terms of morbidity or mortality. A substantive initial post answers the question presented completely and/or asks a thoughtful question pertaining to the topic. Be sure your post is unique. Do not repeat what other students have said. Module 7
Introduction: This week, you explored what Community Health Improvement Plans (CHIPs) and Community Health Assessments (CHAs) look like in the field. You also explored some guidance provided by professional organizations such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the National Association of City and County Health Officials (NACCHO). The next step is to evaluate what your recommendations have been for your portfolio project and compare that to what your community is doing to address the issue.
Initial Post: Find your community’s state or county County Health Assessment (CHA) and Community Health Improvement Plan (CHIP). You can do this by typing your county name along with the search terms with Community Health Assessment or Community Health Improvement plan. What were similarities between your critical thinking portfolio assignment and your community’s CHIP and CHA. Did you identify similar issues and make similar recommendations?
Module 8
Introduction: This week you were introduced to two different and distinct ethical frameworks which are the deontological and utilitarian arguments. Throughout the course, you have been exposed to the public health approach through surveillance, education, regulation/law, and treatment. Some of these practices are distinctly different from the clinical approach and others are similar. Each approach could be in direct opposition to either the deontological or the utilitarian frameworks.
Initial Post: Consider the deontological argument and the utilitarian arguments presented in the required readings for this week. Now consider your portfolio project. Are there any conflicts between either of the ethical schools of thought with regards to your planned interventions?
Please answer each separately.

Lab Breakdown Video: In this lab, students will observe primates. They will cond

Lab Breakdown Video:
In this lab, students will observe primates. They will conduct an ad lib study and create an ethogram. Instructors may choose to assign this lab along with the “Primate Behavior Lab: Part II,” in which students use the ethogram they create in this lab while conducting scan sampling and continuous focal animal sampling.
Collecting Data in an Online Lab Class
For our online class you will be practicing the following instructions either using a primate webcam at a zoo or by observing a group of humans using this particular technique. Goal
Conduct an ad lib observation of one species of primate to look for patterns of behavior you have read about. Then provide an Ethogram of the primate species
Prompt
Collect your observations of a group of primates via one of the zoo webcams linked below. If you aren’t able to access the webcams, you may observe a group of humans. If you observe humans, use the same procedures and pretend you don’t understand why they might be doing things, only describe what they are doing with out any interpretation. Create an ethogram of the behaviors you observed.
Chattanooga Zoo TamarinsLinks to an external site.
Detroit Zoo Japanese MacaquesLinks to an external site.
Houston Zoo ChimpanzeesLinks to an external site.
PIN Common MarmosetsLinks to an external site.
Reid Park Zoo LemursLinks to an external site.
San Diego Zoo BaboonsLinks to an external site.
San Diego Zoo OrangutansLinks to an external site.
Instructions
1. Ad lib data:
Review one of the previous pages on: Ad Lib Studies
On any piece of paper you have handy (8 1/2 x 11 notebook paper or printer paper is best), write the common and scientific names of the species you have selected, as well as the number and types of individuals (how many primates, females, males and children). You may need to browse on the zoo website to find the needed information. Write everything you see happening in the enclosure for a period of 30 minutes (make sure you review the example on the Ad lib study page). Do not rewrite or type up your notes. Use additional sheets of paper if needed. Write down what happens, who does it, and when. Submit a photo or several photos, or a scanned version, of the actual notes you wrote at the zoo. You can take the photo with your phone or any other tech you have available. 2. Review Developing an Ethogram: After you collect your ad lib notes, complete the table on the Week Download Week2 Ad Lib Ethogram.docx Download 2 Ad Lib Ethogram.docxworksheet listing and describing the behaviors you observed for your species. Please open this in Word or Google docs and type your work into the table. Save it and upload it back into the assignment along with the photos of your ad lib notes.
Grading
Learning and growth take practice and reflection and I am here to support your efforts. All assignments will receive an initial grade based on the provided rubric. If you aren’t happy with the points you receive or need to improve your submission, everyone will have the option to review my feedback, revise your work, and resubmit your assignment by the “available until” date 1 week after the original due date. If you have questions about how to improve a submission or about my feedback, please ask me.
My goal is to provide feedback within 72 hours, at the latest, of the due date for the assignment.