Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30%

For This or a Similar Paper Click Here To Order Now

Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. An originality report is provided when you submit your task that can be used as a guide.
You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.
Tasks may not be submitted as cloud links, such as links to Google Docs, Google Slides, OneDrive, etc., unless specified in the task requirements. All other submissions must be file types that are uploaded and submitted as attachments (e.g., .docx, .pdf, .ppt).
A. Discuss two differences in how an advanced professional nurse advocates for an at-risk population in the community versus how an advanced professional nurse advocates for an individual patient in the clinical practice setting. Include scholarly source(s) as part of your response.
B. Describe how the advanced professional nurse will apply two evidence-based strategies to promote interprofessional collaboration within an Advocacy Action Team (AAT). Include one scholarly source to support your description.
C. Analyze data that validates a health issue affecting an at-risk population in the county or state where you live or work. Include relevant source(s) as part of your response.
D. Describe two characteristics of the at-risk population identified in part C.
E. Analyze how a specific social determinant of health (SDOH) in the county or state is predisposing the at-risk population from part C to the health issue identified in part C.
F. Analyze how current policy is insufficient to address the SDOH identified in part E.
Note: Current policy may be a county ordinance, county or state regulation, state law, program, school curriculum, health initiative, etc.
G. Provide a policy proposal to address the SDOH identified in part E. Include scholarly source(s) to support your policy proposal as part of your response.
1. Describe how the policy proposal could impact the health issue from part C.
2. Discuss how the policy proposal will address diversity in the population to ensure equitable distribution of resources.
3. Describe how the policy proposal upholds two provisions from the ANA Code of Ethics. Include relevant source(s) as part of your response.
4. Describe two actual or potential barriers in your county or state that impede the implementation of the policy proposal.
H. Provide the name and title of one policymaker with authority to move the policy proposal forward.
1. Provide the rationale for choosing the policymaker identified in part H.
I. Describe two strategies you will use as an advanced professional nurse to strengthen your professional practice as a policy advocate.
J. Create an (I)SBAR summary of the policy proposal using the attached “(I)SBAR Summary Template. Save and submit your (I)SBAR summary as a separate .pdf or .docx document.
Note: Refer to the article titled “Using SBAR to Communicate with Policymakers” found in Unit 3 of the Course of Study.
K. Incorporate the following components of APA style and formatting in your paper:
• bias-free language
• APA-specific rules regarding verb tense, voice, and perspective
• a title page and headers
• in-text citations and references
• APA-specific formatting rules for margins, spacing, numbering, and indentation for the title page and main body of your paper, including headers, bulleted and numbered lists, and tables and figures
L. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.
File Restrictions
File name may contain only letters, numbers, spaces, and these symbols: ! – _ . * ‘ ( )
File size limit: 200 MB
File types allowed: doc, docx, rtf, xls, xlsx, ppt, pptx, odt, pdf, txt, qt, mov, mpg, avi, mp3, wav, mp4, wma, flv, asf, mpeg, wmv, m4v, svg, tif, tiff, jpeg, jpg, gif, png, zip, rar, tar, 7z
RUBRIC
A:ADVANCED PROFESSIONAL NURSE AS ADVOCATE
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not discuss how an advanced professional nurse advocates for an at-risk population in the community versus an individual patient in the clinical setting.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission does not accurately discuss 2 differences in how an advanced professional nurse advocates for an at-risk population in the community versus how the nurse advocates for an individual patient in the clinical practice setting. Or the submission discusses only 1 difference in the advocacy role between the 2 settings. Or the discussion does not include scholarly source(s).
COMPETENT
The submission accurately discusses 2 differences in how an advanced professional nurse advocates for an at-risk population in the community versus how an advanced professional nurse advocates for an individual patient in the clinical practice setting. The discussion includes scholarly source(s).
B:INTERPROFESSIONAL COLLABORATION
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not describe how the advanced professional nurse could apply evidence-based strategies to promote interprofessional collaboration within an AAT.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission does not logically describe how the advanced professional nurse applies 2 evidence-based strategies to promote interprofessional collaboration within an AAT. Or the submission discusses only 1 evidence-based strategy to promote interprofessional collaboration within an AAT. Or the discussion does not include 1 scholarly source.
COMPETENT
The submission logically describes how the advanced professional nurse applies 2 evidence-based strategies to promote interprofessional collaboration within an AAT. The discussion includes 1 scholarly source.
C:DATA DRIVEN HEALTH ISSUE
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not provide an analysis of data that validates a specific health issue in the county or state.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission provides an analysis of the data, but the analysis does not validate a specific health issue in the county or state where the candidate lives or works. Or the analysis does not include relevant source(s).
COMPETENT
The submission provides an analysis of data that validates a health issue affecting an at-risk population in the county or state where the candidate lives or works. The analysis includes relevant source(s).
D:CHARACTERISTICS OF AT-RISK POPULATION
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not describe characteristics of the at-risk population within the county or state.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission only describes 1 characteristic of the at-risk population within the county or state identified in part C. Or the characteristics are listed but not described.
COMPETENT
The submission describes 2 characteristics of the at-risk population within the county or state identified in part C.
E:SOCIAL DETERMINANT OF HEALTH (SDOH)
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not provide an analysis of how the SDOH in the county or state is predisposing the at-risk population to the identified health issue.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission does not provide a logical analysis of how the SDOH in the county or state predisposes the at-risk population to the health issue identified in part C.
COMPETENT
The submission provides a logical analysis of how a specific SDOH in the county or state predisposes the at-risk population to the health issue identified in part C.
F:CURRENT POLICY
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not provide an analysis of how a current policy is insufficient to address the SDOH from part E.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission provides an analysis but does not explain how current policy is insufficient to address the SDOH identified in part E. Or the policy analyzed is not relevant to the SDOH identified in part E.
COMPETENT
The submission provides an analysis of how current policy is insufficient to address the SDOH identified in part E. The policy analyzed is relevant to the SDOH.
G:POLICY PROPOSAL
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not present a policy proposal that addresses the SDOH from part E.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission presents a policy proposal that does not logically address the SDOH from part E. Or, the policy proposal is not supported by scholarly source(s).
COMPETENT
The submission provides a policy proposal that logically addresses the SDOH from part E. The policy proposal is supported by scholarly source(s).
G1:HEALTH ISSUE IMPACT
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not describe how the policy proposal could impact the health issue described in part C.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission describes the policy proposal, but does not logically explain how the policy proposal could impact the health issue described in part C.
COMPETENT
The submission provides a logical description of how the policy proposal could impact the health issue described in part C.
G2:EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION OF RESOURCES
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not provide a discussion about how the policy proposal will address diversity to ensure equitable distribution of resources.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission does not logically discuss how the policy will address diversity to ensure equitable distribution of resources.
COMPETENT
The submission provides a logical discussion of how the policy proposal will address diversity to ensure equitable distribution of resources.
G3:ETHICAL PROVISIONS
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not discuss any provisions from the ANA Code of Ethics.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission discusses 2 provisions from the ANA Code of Ethics but fails to reveal how the policy proposal will uphold each ANA Code of Ethics provision. Or only 1 provision is discussed. Or the discussion does not include relevant source(s).
COMPETENT
The submission describes how the policy proposal upholds 2 provisions from the ANA Code of Ethics. The discussion includes relevant source(s).
G4:BARRIERS
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not describe actual or potential barriers to the implementation of the policy proposal in the county or state.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission does not logically describe 2 actual or potential barriers in the county or state that will impede the policy proposal’s implementation. Or only 1 actual or potential barrier is described.
COMPETENT
The submission logically describes 2 actual or potential barriers in the county or state that impede the implementation of the policy proposal.
H:POLICY MAKER
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not provide the name and title of a policymaker.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission provides the name or title of 1 policymaker with the authority to move the policy proposal forward but not both.
COMPETENT
The submission provides both the name and title of one 1 policymaker with authority to move the policy proposal forward.
H1:RATIONALE
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not provide a rationale for choosing the policymaker in part H.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission does not provide a logical rationale for selecting the policymaker identified in part H.
COMPETENT
The submission provides a logical rationale for choosing the policymaker in part H.
I:STRATEGIC NEXT STEPS
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not describe any strategies the candidate would use as an advanced professional nurse to strengthen professional practice.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission does not sufficiently describe 2 strategies the candidate would use as an advanced professional nurse to strengthen professional practice as a policy advocate. Or, the submission describes only 1 strategy.
COMPETENT
The submission sufficiently describes 2 strategies the candidate would use as an advanced professional nurse to strengthen professional practice as a policy advocate.
J:POLICY SUMMARY
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not provide a summary of the policy proposal.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission provides a summary of the policy proposal but does not use the (I)SBAR format or does not address each element of the (I)SBAR. Or the (I)SBAR summary is not submitted as a separate document.
COMPETENT
The submission provides a complete (I)SBAR summary of the policy proposal to the policymaker identified in part H using the provided template and addresses each element of the (I)SBAR. The summary is submitted as a separate document.
K:APA SOURCES
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not include in-text citations and references according to APA style for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission includes in-text citations and references for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized but does not demonstrate a consistent application of APA style.
COMPETENT
The submission includes in-text citations and references for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and demonstrates a consistent application of APA style.
L:PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION
NOT EVIDENT
Content is unstructured, is disjointed, or contains pervasive errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar. Vocabulary or tone is unprofessional or distracts from the topic.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
Content is poorly organized, is difficult to follow, or contains errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar that cause confusion. Terminology is misused or ineffective.
COMPETENT
The content reflects an attention to detail, is organized, and focuses on the main ideas as prescribed in the task or chosen by the candidate. Terminology is pertinent, is used correctly, and effectively conveys the intended meaning. Mechanics, usage, and grammar promote accurate interpretation and understanding.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
(I)SBAR Summary Template.docx
AWM2 Template.docx
My topic was
Health Issue in My County or State
The prevalence of obesity.
“At Risk” Population Affected
Adult Population
SDOH
Inadequate access to coordinated social physical activity in low income communities.
Recommended Policy Change
Community outreach through organized physical activity and education in the community.
Data Source(s)
County Health Rankings & Road Map
My community is Delray Beach Florida..

For This or a Similar Paper Click Here To Order Now