This is a peer review please keep it simple. This is the Criteria Introduction:

For This or a Similar Paper Click Here To Order Now

This is a peer review please keep it simple.
This is the Criteria
Introduction:
Does the writer use a title of his/her own choosing?
Is the introduction clearly introduce the sources? Is it well developed with background, summary, or other necessary information?
Is the writer’s claim (thesis) clearly stated? Does it present a clear position on the sources, synthesizing them in some way?
Is it limited or too broad?
Body of Paper:
Is the paper logically and effectively organized? For instance, if the synthesis is a comparison/contrast, does it use point-by-point organization? If the synthesis is an argument using the sources as evidence, are the sources treated in a balanced, logical way?
Are the points within the paper clearly stated in topic sentences?
Are the points well supported by evidence (quotations or paraphrase from the source)? Where would you like to hear more evidence?
Are the sources documented correctly, using MLA style?
Are the points well supported by analysis of the evidence? Where would you like to hear more?
Are there appropriate and effective transitions between paragraphs? sentences? ideas?
Are you convinced by the writer’s evidence and analysis? Why or why not?
Conclusion:
Does the conclusion provide closure for the paper overall?
Are you left with a sense of completeness when you finish reading the paper or do there seem to be loose ends, unanswered questions? If so, list any questions you may have about the paper which went unanswered.
Voice and Style:
Check for wordiness, awkward sentences, and misspelled words. If you find these errors, mention them in your comments by telling the writer where you think they are in the paper (i.e. 1st para., 3rd sent.)
Is the paper’s style appropriate for its audience and purpose?
Does the writer use an appropriate tone for writing for an argument?
Does this writer seem overly judgmental? overly sentimental? credible? honest? educated?
Are there some places where this attitude is more obvious than others?
Is the writer’s voice consistent?
As the writer goes between quotes and evidence from the sources to his/her own interpretation, are there bumps and obvious voice shifts?
This is the Essay
Priscilla Blanco
Eng 201
Synthesis Paper
05/11/2022
HealthCare Pandemic Burnout
In this written synthesis, “Prevalence And Correlates Of Stress And Burnout Among U.S. Healthcare Workers During The COVID-19 Pandemic: A National Cross-Sectional Survey Study” by Kriti Prasad et al. explain survey results regarding stress and burnout amongst healthcare workers. Prasad et al. share their study funded by the American Medical Association. Another reference in this written synthesis is “Relationship Between Nurse Burnout, Patient And Organizational Outcomes: Systematic Review” a journal entry by Jin Jun et al. with studies associated with the International Journal of Nursing Studies. Last reference, “An Expanded Institutional And National-Level Blueprint To Address Nurse Burnout And Moral Suffering Amid The Evolving Pandemic,” by Amelia E. Schlak et al. is an educational study shared with nurses in nursing management by PubMed. COVID Healthcare workers experienced high levels of stress and burnout with the possibility to adapt to national recommendations for policy change.
JinJun et al. described burnout as “emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and decreased personal accomplishments, poses a significant burden on individual nurses’ health and mental wellbeing” (JinJun et al.) Kriti Prasad et al. state, “COVID-19 has put extraordinary stress on healthcare workers. (Prasad et al.) As mentioned, over 60 percent of healthcare workers report additional stress in their daily jobs. There were many types of surveys that asked questions such as do you have a fear of exposure or transmission, new symptoms of anxiety or depression, and burnout. Many healthcare workers who completed the survey reported feeling all of the above. Prasad and the team noted daily stress was at an all-time high with an increase in workload. Many research surveys reported women had more challenging work environments than men, and levels of fear of exposure were higher amongst Black and the Latinx community than whites. Prasads et al. findings identified that “approximately 50% of workers do not feel valued, organizations might consider exploring the mediators of feeling valued (fear, mental health, and workload) in order to address burnout and support the mental wellbeing of their workforces”. Prasad concludes that corporations could improve healthcare workers’ environments, and their sense of feeling valued would help burnout.
Areas affected by nurse burnout include patient safety, quality of care, nurse productivity, and patient satisfaction. (Jinjun et al.) Organizations at large have contributed to nursing burnout by applying no changes to hazardous work conditions, such as understaffing and corporation frameworks(Schlak et al.). Nurse and healthcare worker burnout has a misconception that COVID is to blame for staff leaving their jobs. In fact, the pandemic has brought to light problems our health care systems face. (Schlak et al.) Per Schlak et al., “Scientific consensus suggests that understaffing, poor work environments and the lack of robust ethical frameworks are the primary contributors to the development of burnout and moral suffering among nurses.”
During the COVID 19 pandemic, individual burnout has now been escalated and viewed as a systemic organizational issue. Luckily for organizations, Shlak et al. developed system solutions to effectively minimize burnout due to the pandemic. National recommendations for policy change include many policy changes such as redesigning workflows, systemic improvements to the work environment, and nursing professional development. Shlak et al. mention health administrators should conduct better clinical and ethical changes for nurses to be able to deliver safely. Institutional recommendations include evidence-based strategies for improving nurse and healthcare outcomes. Research shows pandemic healthcare workers who experienced burnout can achieve lower levels of stress if systemic policy changes are made to allow better work environments.
Work Cited
Jun, Jin, et al. “Relationship between Nurse Burnout, Patient and Organizational Outcomes: Systematic Review.” International Journal of Nursing Studies, Pergamon, 26 Mar. 2021, www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0020748921000742#!
Prasad, Kriti, et al. “Prevalence and Correlates of Stress and Burnout among U.S. Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A National Cross-Sectional Survey Study.” Define_me, American Medical Association (AMA), 16 May 2021, www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(21)00159-0/fulltext#seccesectitle0015.
Schlak, Amelia E. PhD, RN; Rosa, William E. PhD, MBE, NP-BC, FAAN, FAANP; Rushton, Cynda H. PhD, RN, FAAN; Poghosyan, Lusine PhD, MPH, RN, FAAN; Root, Maggie C. MSN, RN, CHPPN, CPNP-AC; McHugh, Matthew D. PhD, JD, MPH, RN, FAAN An expanded institutional- and national-level blueprint to address nurse burnout and moral suffering amid the evolving pandemic, Nursing Management (Springhouse): January 2022 – Volume 53 – Issue 1 – p 16-27 doi: 10.1097/01.NUMA.0000805032.15402.b3

For This or a Similar Paper Click Here To Order Now