The goal of this assignment is for you to critique a published empirical journal

For This or a Similar Paper Click Here To Order Now

The goal of this assignment is for you to critique a published empirical journal article.
This will draw upon the skills and knowledge you have been learning in class. You will
highlight the strengths and the weaknesses of how the article is written and how the study was
conducted.
Assignment
You will read the assigned empirical journal article, critically analyze the research, and
highlight its strengths and weaknesses. You will write up the research critique in a 750 paper.
Your paper should have five main sections:
Summary
A brief summary of the article. This is your summary of the article, not the abstract for
the article or a summary from another source.
Introduction
A description of the strengths and weaknesses of the introduction. For this section, you
should determine whether the authors provide support for the primary hypotheses in the paper. In
other words, do the authors provide a focused explanation for their hypotheses? You should also
address whether the hypotheses are reasonable and whether the authors describe the implications
of their hypotheses.
Methods A description of the strengths and weaknesses of the method section. This section should
include a critique of the sample characteristics and recruitment, the procedures/design for the
study, and the measures/materials used. For example, does the sample seem representative of the
population of interest? Did the authors operationalize the variables of interest appropriately? Do
the measures/materials fit the operational definitions of the variables of interest?
Results
A description of the strengths and weaknesses of the results section. This section should
include consideration of both the descriptive and inferential statistics presented, as well as the
use of figures and tables. This section can focus on the presentation of data and whether the
analyses seem to fit the hypotheses and include whether the analyses were appropriate for the
study or other analyses should have been considered.
Discussion
A description of the strengths and weaknesses of the discussion. The authors’
interpretation of their results should be assessed in this section. Specifically, do the authors’
interpretations seem reasonable given the methods and results in the study? In addition, you
should discuss the limitations of the study that the authors include in the discussion, if any are
included.
Specifics
The word limit is a minimum of 700 words and a maximum of 750 words. The paper
must follow all APA style guidelines. This includes using Times New Roman font, font size of
12, double spaced, 1-inch margins on all sides, running head, and page numbers.

For This or a Similar Paper Click Here To Order Now