Guidelines for the Critical Analysis of a Scientific Primary Source 1.) Introduc

For This or a Similar Paper Click Here To Order Now

Guidelines for the Critical Analysis of a Scientific Primary Source
1.) Introduction
2.) Materials and Methods
The methods provide details on samples, analytical tools, study design, equipment, potential sources of error, and methods of statistical analysis.
Results
The results section of a scientific paper presents the authors’ analysis of the data. This section summarizes the data using tables, graphs, figures, and statistics. This is the section of the paper to focus on to determine the reliability of the authors’ conclusions.
Tables
Tables, like figures, organize or summarize data.
Figures
Figures present key information graphically to help readers visualize patterns in the data.
Discussion and Conclusion
The discussion is the section where authors explain their interpretation of their data and how it reflects on their hypothesis or informs their question.This is another section where unfamiliar ideas might be stated. Look up concepts or consult additional references to fully understand the conclusion.
References
References are extensively cited in the introduction and are used to frame the purpose of the work and questions that will be addressed by the study. The references cited are act as a scientific scaffold for the authors to build upon. The format of citations depends on the journal. These references can be used to learn about an area of research.
Rubric
Rubric for Critical analysis and Review of a Primary Scientific Source Department of Biology, Chemistry and Environmental Studies (1)
Criteria
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent Summary: Main Idea Accuracy
*Complete: Finds all the major ideas of the author, with complete accuracy.
*Partial: Conveys a general sense of the idea of the author with some errors.
*Not at all: Does not convey the ideas of the author or conveys ideas of the author with major errors.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent Summary: Identifies author’s bias, assumptions, and evidence
*Complete: Summarizes all of the author’s biased assumptions and evidence.
*Partial: Summarizes some of the author’s bias, assumptions, and evidence but not all.
*Not at All: Does not summarize the author’s main ideas, biases, assumptions, and evidence
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent analysis: Reactions to author’s main idea, biases, assumptions, and evidence influence the body of scientific knowledge.
*Complete: Provides a reflective personal reaction to all of the author’s main ideas, biases, assumptions, and
evidence
*Partial: Provides a reflective personal reaction to some of the author’s main ideas, biases, assumptions, and evidence but not all or with some errors.
*Not at All: Does not develop a personal reaction to author’s main ideas, biases, assumptions, and evidence or with major errors
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConventions: APA or CSE
*Complete: Demonstrates correct application of APA or CSE citation format.
*Partial: Demonstrates inconsistent application of APA or CSE citation format.
*Not at All: Does not demonstrate correct application of APA or CSE citation format.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization and development: Cohesiveness
*Complete: Develops ideas clearly, making use of a wide variety of relevant details.
*Partial: Develops ideas, making use of a some relevant details.
*Not at All: Does not develop ideas that are supported by detail, which results in a lack of cohesiveness.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization and Development: Coherence
*Complete: Exhibits an exemplary logical and coherent structure through effective use of appropriate literary devices and transitions
*Partial: Exhibits a logical and coherent structure through effective use of appropriate literacy devices and transitions
*Not at All: Does not demonstrate coherence.

For This or a Similar Paper Click Here To Order Now