Findings from the 9/11 Commission In Week 2, review a summary of the 9/11 Commis

For This or a Similar Paper Click Here To Order Now

Findings from the 9/11 Commission
In Week 2, review a summary of the 9/11 Commission’s findings in the video at the bottom of the page and provide your interpretation of the information known to U.S. intelligence that may have prevented this outcome.
After you watch the video, you will write a two-page paper (not including the cover and reference page) in APA format, and address the following question.
Could the 9/11 terrorist attack been prevented?
Be sure to support your response with facts and opinions published in the report. Include the citation and full reference.
Please watch the following instructional video.
This week, there is a two-page paper (not including the cover and reference page) in APA format due.
Week 2 Case Study Grading Rubric
Week 2 Case Study Grading Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePurpose
The purpose is evident, student thoroughly addresses the assignment and demonstrates knowledge of the subject matter.
10 to >9.0 pts
Excellent
The thesis is well constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. The student includes both an introductory and closing paragraph.
9 to >8.0 pts
Competent
The thesis statement provides a decent sense of what will be addressed in the paper, but may be slightly unclear, or lacking in insight or originality. The student includes both an introductory and closing paragraph.
8 to >7.0 pts
Fair
The central idea is not clear. Paper title and thesis do not connect well or title is unimaginative. The student includes an introductory paragraph.
7 to >6.0 pts
Poor
Difficult to identify the central idea. Student fails to include an introductory or closing paragraph.
6 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
The paper does not meet this requirement .
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization and Support
The elements of the assignment were fully developed and presented in a well thought out and logic manner.
30 to >29.0 pts
Excellent
The student clearly describes all required elements of the assignment. The student’s conclusion is well organized, focused, and includes ample evidence to support the overall purpose and conclusions.
29 to >24.0 pts
Competent
The student describes all of the required elements of the assignment. The response is organized, focused, and includes some evidence to support the overall purpose and conclusions.
24 to >21.0 pts
Fair
The student describes all of the required elements of the assignment. The response is somewhat organized and includes some evidence to support the overall purpose and conclusions.
21 to >18.0 pts
Poor
The student fails to describe all of the elements of the assignment. The response lacks organization and evidence to support the overall purpose and conclusions.
18 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
The paper does not meet this requirement .
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style
The paper has a properly formatted APA cover sheet. In-text citations and the full reference page is formatted correctly. The paper includes subtopic headings clearly identifying each section/question addressed and at least two academic resources.
5 to >4.5 pts
Excellent
No errors in APA style. Student includes academic resources and uses subtopic headings that clearly identify each section of the paper.
4.5 to >4.0 pts
Competent
A few errors in APA style (citations and references) that do not detract from the presentation. Student includes resources, but they are not all scholarly.
4 to >3.5 pts
Fair
Multiple, noticeable errors in APA style (citations and references) which detract from the presentation. Student fails to use academic resources.
3.5 to >3.0 pts
Poor
Significant errors in APA style (citations and references) which detract from the presentation and missing resources.
3 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
The paper does not meet this requirement .
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics
Student complies with all assignment requirements and includes the required sections. The complete paper should be at least 2 pages long, not including the cover and reference pages. Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed. Spelling is correct. Sentences are well-constructed, with consistently strong, varied sentences.
5 to >4.5 pts
Excellent
Correct use of punctuation, no run-on sentences, minimal to no spelling errors. Conforms in every way to format requirements.
4.5 to >4.0 pts
Competent
Sentence structure and grammar is strong despite occasional transgressions. Some (minor) spelling errors; may have one run-on sentence. Conforms in every way to format requirements.
4 to >3.5 pts
Fair
There are problems in sentence structure and grammar and some errors in punctuation and spelling. May have some run-on sentences. Conforms in almost every way to format requirements.
3.5 to >3.0 pts
Poor
Frequent major errors in punctuation and spelling. Many spelling and grammar errors, use of incomplete sentences, inadequate proofreading. Does not conform to format requirements.
3 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
The paper does not meet this requirement .
5 pts
Total Points: 50

For This or a Similar Paper Click Here To Order Now