Discussion – Analytics for Business Survival ***Please note. Initial post is nee

For This or a Similar Paper Click Here To Order Now

Discussion – Analytics for Business Survival
***Please note. Initial post is needed by due date. I will update order with 2 peer reviews that I will need answered. My initial post only needs to be 310 words minimum and 2 scholarly citations.
Peer reviews will be each 200 word minimum with one peer reply needing a scholarly citation. I will update later today withe peer reviews that i will need answered.
REVIEW
Review the assigned reading to prepare for this discussion.
The Digitization of Just About Everything (Attahced Below)
Proverbs 10:9 (Whoever walks in integrity walks securely,
but whoever takes crooked paths will be found out.)
You may choose another relevant scripture, if you prefer, to frame your response.
Organizations that fail to maintain a barometer on their business activities face the threat of losing footing in the market. In the age of digitization and data collection business professionals must understand the role of analytics today to shape tomorrow’s business future for survival. Advanced analytics is the key to answering complex business problems and helping an organization remain relevant and competitive.
RESPOND
Share an example of a company that has contributed to the increase in the use of big data usage. Explain how the company’s services or products may impact an organization’s approach to using data analytics to inform business decisions.
Businesses have the ability to collect data on just about everything. How businesses collect and present the data may have ethical implications. Explain whether you believe there are ethical implications from a Christian worldview perspective for how businesses present data.
Requirements
Initial Post: 310 words minimum
APA formatting
Citation Requirement: Minimum of 3 scholarly, peer-reviewed source properly cited and referenced.
The textbook can be used as a reference in addition to one scholarly, peer-reviewed article.
Online sources (e.g., Wikipedia, Investopedia, blogs, smallbus.chron, online magazines) are not scholarly or authoritative sources.
Industry-related, authoritative sources may be acceptable
See grading rubric for specific guidelines regarding scoring
DISCUSS
Post substantive responses to your colleagues. Responses could include suggestions for further resources, questions of clarification, or providing context and insight. Avoid simple posts of agreement; if you agree, explain why, and then thoughtfully further the conversation.
Requirements
Response to Peers: 200 words minimum
Respond to more than the minimum of two peers (see discussion rubrics in the syllabus for details)

For This or a Similar Paper Click Here To Order Now